Helping This publish for 47 more years

Evan with hot dog

This is my friend Evan. He is going to eat 47 hot dogs in one sitting if we can raise $4,700 for This Magazine. He will also draw pictures of contributors as hot dogs instead, if that’s your bag.

I’m sharing this because This is a stellar publication produced by awesome people. It’s one of Canada’s only truly independent magazines—it doesn’t rely on advertising or corporate support and produces really great stuff. You can learn more about it here. I’m also sharing it because having studied and worked in publishing, I have a soft spot for the titles that keep on keepin’ on. Especially the indies.

Sold on contributing? You can do that here. (There’s only 4 days left in the campaign!)


I’m riding 75k! For the very first time!

Hey pals. I’m one of those people doing Ride for Heart this year. I’m trying to raise $1,000 for the Heart and Stroke Foundation, which uses funds for research, awareness and all that jazz regarding heart disease and stoke, 2 out of 3 leading causes of death for Canadians.

I am also going to try to ride 75k. In one day. For the very first time. On a brand new bicycle that I made (not pictured yet because she isn’t ready yet, but soon).

If you’re into helping me out with that, you can do so here. (Please note that Kintera is kind of awful and sometimes pages don’t load. Try refreshing if it is sucking for you.)

Everyone is doing this. So why donate through my page?

Well, in addition to receiving an update on the ride, you may pick one of two perks: 1. I will commit to going to karaoke every week after the ride (June 2nd). Every person who donates more than $10 may pick a song and I *have* to sing it, no matter how terribly. I will take requests in order of donations and will film/photograph the awful occurrence for you if you cannot attend, or just for the fun of it. 2. A handwritten card sent to you in THE REAL MAIL from yours truly in which I write a poem about you in a style of your choosing. I will also include a printed Party Boothed photo of you. 3. If you donate $50 or more, I will do both of these things. Let’s talk.

Any big spenders in the crowd? A donation of $100 or more will yield far less terrible perks (TBD).

But seriously, any amount is welcome and appreciated. Thanks for reading!


Drunk Feminist Films: Game of Thrones

I am a major fan of fantasy. And a major fan of Game of Thrones (though I do have my issues with it). So when friend and activist Steph Guthrie asked me to be a guest on Drunk Feminist Films, I was all over that.

It was a pretty great time.

Anyway, tonight at the Academy of Impossible we’re doing a panel before a screening of the season three premiere. Check it out if you’re so inclined! Fun starts at 8pm. More details here.


Why it’s important to talk about Tropes vs Women in Video Games

I’ve been thinking a lot about video games. I recently started a Mass Effect play through for when I’m burnt out on words (it is basically the best thing), and I realized just how much I’ve missed serious gaming. In thinking about why I gave it up I usually blamed time, but it was also because of the less than stellar representations in console games.

So I’m pleased to share the short, not-at-all-comprehensive primer I wrote for Post Arcade on Tropes vs. Women in Video Games and why it’s important. I’ve always wanted to write more about gaming and had a lot of fun with this.


On the lack of women in politics

Quite some time ago, during the last Ontario election, I wrote a piece for the Huffington Post about the lack of women in politics. I’m reposting it here so people can read it without being bombarded by “related articles” such as “The 50 Hottest Women in Politics.” Sigh.

Original publish date: June 26, 2011

Last night, the Toronto Star published an article that asked: “Where are the female provincial candidates?

The writer, Tanya Talaga, often writes about the lack of women in Canadian politics and I applaud her for taking on this fight. I don’t, however, agree that we should focus on party nominations. We need to address the reasons why women don’t want to run for office in the first place, without being pursued by political parties.

I believe that equal political representation is incredibly important. I’m an activist. I care about my city and its people and there is much I’d like to improve. People tell me that I would make an excellent political candidate because of my passion, but when I think about the combative, dirty-pool, public-scrutiny-all-the-time, men’s club that is Canadian politics, I cringe.

No one is exempt from media attacks, misrepresentation, and the shockingly popular appeal of prying into political candidates’ sex lives and manufacturing scandals—R.I.P. Adam Giambrone’s very short political career — but we need to recognize that women face additional obstacles due to sexism and a long history of second-class citizenry and erasure. This is especially important when considering the challenges faced by women of colour, poor women, Aboriginal women, and those from the LGBT community.

While I am both white and cisgendered, which gives me a one-up on many women in this country, I don’t possess all of the traits of traditional femininity. I can already envision how I’d be attacked by media and opponents — based on parts of my life that are unrelated to my ability to get things done—and that doesn’t appeal to me.

Being a politician seems to be more about bashing opposition and maintaining “proper” public image than actually doing things. I’m one of those women who, as Anne McLellan said, wants to “…solve real problems for real people.”

Media depictions of women who don’t conform to standard puritan ideals continue to be negative. If you don’t believe me, read news about sex workers (who are dehumanized) or sexual assault cases (in which victims are often blamed. Let us not forget what happened to Lara Logan).

When it comes to politics, it’s no different. In just one of many examples, the Toronto Sun ran a cover that compared Helena Guergis to a black mutt. No matter how outlandish this seems to some of us, the way media represents women stems from actual ideas about women, and how they should be treated and perceived. Scott Alexander Ross wrote about his experience while canvassing door-to-door for Christy Clark in Kelowna, B.C.:

“I entered the garage and saw four men of varying ages and one younger woman around a supped-up quad. I introduced myself, explained why I was there and the importance of joining the B.C. Liberals to vote for their choice for the next premier. I handed out flyers, each having a picture of Christy Clark on them and before I was finished I was interrupted with questions of her relationship status, of her body shape, and other questions of increasing inappropriateness. These soon turned into comments of a similar nature.”

As if this wasn’t enough to turn me off of politics, there’s my lack of money and fundraising skills. There’s also the possibility of my reproducing. If I decide to be a mother, I will be presented with few childcare options and unless I find myself in a very fortunate position, I will be saddled with the majority of domestic tasks. I would likely find pursuing a career in politics impossible.

Canada is increasing its number of women in politics, having just elected a record number of women during this past federal election. This is important. According to Equal Voice:

“Polling shows that women care about different issues. The United Nations says that a critical mass of at least 30 per cent women is needed before legislatures produce public policy representing women’s concerns and before political institutions begin to change the way they do business.”

While it’s true that men and women often care about the same things and gendering concerns can be problematic, we mustn’t forget that people advocate for causes that affect them directly. I don’t think that a 54-year-old man has the same concerns about reproductive rights as I do, and even if he does it’s probably not on his list of priorities. This is what makes many voters skeptical of a system with mostly white, male, heterosexual candidates. We want the system to change but when we don’t see ourselves represented, it’s more difficult to feel comfortable getting involved.

Until we address all the reasons why our political system is unattractive to many women, we won’t see a truly representative government, and that is a much larger task than offering incentives and nominations.


The Agenda

Last night I was part of a panel that discussed anxiety and the university experience. If that seems like something you’d like to watch, here it is!


The Shit Girls Say thing

This got a lot of attention on my Tumblr so I thought I’d put it here. This blog needs some love.

On Shit Girls Say and girl hate (from everyone)

I’ve been mulling this whole Shit Girls Say thing over for a while now and I think I’ve finally figured out what it is that bothers me about it: Everything. And that includes you, other people who hate it.

If you’ve been living under a rock for the past week or so, Toronto dudes Graydon Sheppard and Kyle Humphrey released Episode 1 of Shit Girls Say, which has done the whole viral thing—so much so, that Episode 2 has just been released.

The appeal of Shit Girls Say is its “oh it’s so funny because it’s true” angle and I think many women can admit to saying at least some of these things. As Lynn Crosbie wrote in the Globe and Mail:

Is the video uncanny? Yes. It is like being lightly slapped, over and over again. That starts to sting, then infuriate.

And it is so easy to look forward to a time when a girl or woman will express one of the banalities in the video and be mocked for it. Mocked for saying, “Did you miss me?” or “Be nice.” Are women not scrutinized enough?

Girls, or young women, who already speak largely in the interrogative and treat the world of men as another, completely inscrutable species, have enough on their minds already. They are already sexualized to the maximum. Must their every word be a potential joke?

Girls speak casually about inane things. Girls speak, too, about sexual violence and quantum physics. They talk about fear and art, children, murder and opera; philosophy, blood, sex and mathematics.

I don’t know about you, but I’m pretty tired of humour that relies on tired stereotypes and gender essentialism. None of these jokes are new—we’ve been making fun of “Valley girls” for decades, and girls in general. In the words of my houselord Miriam: “I feel like it [Shit Girls Say] came from Christmas past to remind us how all jokes about women used to be about how we are dumb, and annoying, and all the same.”

The men who write these videos and run the Shit Girls Say Twitter account (which offensively uses the photograph of Sharbat Gula)—and that’s right, men—think it’s less harmful because they’re gay. According to the Toronto Star:

Coming from a gay man, it’s a little less threatening than, say, a guy or even a woman acting the part. We kind of have an alliance with women, we’re privy to their conversations. We grew up around women. We also have the advantage of being on the outside looking in. When we started we were a little worried that people would find it sexist and we are really careful about what we tweet. We try not to put anything about violence or (that is) sexist or mean spirited. We kind of take a reverential tone. We know that the funny part to us in the tweets is the complexity of them and the way they can be read, and we respect that. It’s more of an observation. It feels pretty benign and everybody’s in on the joke. We’re just happy that the tone comes through.

Um no, actually it isn’t. And relying on the same tired stereotypes of gay men—that they’re all “in” with women (whatever that means); you know, which isn’t always true—isn’t quite enough to lessen the blow. While many women dream of having the perfect Gay Best Friend with whom she can gab about whatever, most probably wouldn’t appreciate the most inane of their comments ending up on the Internet. For me, the tone does not come through. Putting a gay man in drag doesn’t make the mocking sting any less.

And that’s what this is: Mocking. Even feminists and others outraged by the meme are guilty of this. The retaliatory Shit Girls Say Tumblr, which prides itself on its “smart girl quotes,” has the following tagline: “Because not all of us are vacuous boring shit heads.”

Shit heads. Wow. Sounds like the same ol’ girl hate to me. Of course I understand the intentions behind this Tumblr. I know the frustration of being lumped into a group. I mean, don’t we all? Isn’t that what this meme is all about, Shit Girls Say? It isn’t Shit Some Girls Say or even Shit Some White Upper-Middle Class Women Say. And while I believe it’s still necessary to remind the world that yes, women are smart, and yes, we talk about lots of different things—I also think it’s wrong to do this at the expense of other women.

Because here’s the thing, these women (or um, shit heads, as some call them) are real. There are women who squeal when they meet their friends. There are women who gush about the goodness of food. There are women who speak this way and in this tone. And there are definitely women who talk about inane bullshit—if you say you don’t, you’re a liar—and there’s nothing wrong with that. You don’t have to befriend these women if they annoy you, but I urge you to watch how quick you are to judge women who do fit certain stereotypes and unpack where your superiority complex is really coming from.

Gender stereotypes are gross and trust me, I know what it’s like to be disgusted and frustrated by them. But think about it: You hate this video so much because of how it portrays women. It hits home for some reason. Whether you see yourself in it or are simply offended by the stereotypes, what you’re actually reacting to is the fact that being a woman is still a punchline. And that’s something that’s worthy of your anger.

/humourlessfeministrant


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.